BOOK REVIEW: David Sedaris, "Let's Explore Diabetes with Owls"
The moment I heard that David Sedaris’ new book of
essays, Let’s Explore Diabetes with Owls,
was scheduled to arrive this year, I literally cackled with glee. I first discovered Me Talk Pretty One Day, arguably his best work, in 2007 and have
since eagerly gulped down all of his collections of humorous essays. Sedaris’ wry looks at his family and the
world around him have consistently made me laugh aloud while reading, a rare
feat from an author. For better or for
worse, he spares no one, including himself.
Let’s Explore Diabetes with Owls, unfortunately, fails
to reach the same levels of pure ecstatic humor of the best of his previous
efforts. The pieces of the puzzle are
all there—some essays handling his odd family; a few devoted to his life in Europe
with his longtime boyfriend Hugh, whose personality is revealed more in this
book than in any of Sedaris’ previous efforts; and some intermingled character
studies in which he creates entire conflicts with bystanders all in his
head—but they fail to add up to the same level of quality I had been
expecting.
(davidsedarisbooks.com)
It’s when Sedaris attempts to address issues such as
race that his typical self-effacing yet self-absorbed style left me uncomfortable.
This issue is particularly evident in “A
Friend In the Ghetto”, where the author reveals, via a frame narrative, that
even in later life, his narrow-minded, privileged, white-savior mindset about
race hasn’t changed much. The story
opens with a call from a telemarketer in the present day who Sedaris imagines
has a voice with “snakes[…]dysentery[…]and mangoes” in it and with whom he
wants to talk again, if only to learn about the desperate poverty he imagines
the telemarketer endures (“an old refrigerator beside a drainage ditch” as a
home). He then relays the story from his
childhood in North Carolina, with the advent of integration in schools, when he
pretended to date an outcast black girl (whose name he does not remember) to
make his white family feel uncomfortable, imagining her to be “virtuous” and
humble by nature. What the author
reveals through this unpleasant vignette is that people of color and the less
fortunate remain mere props, examples to make him feel better about his life,
which he readily admits but shows no sign of remorse or regret about. His tendency to think of nearly every person of
color he comes across as some kind of starving, oppressed saint or person eager
to be saved is becomes grating.
Another chapter, in which he eviscerates the entirety
of Chinese cuisine, is similarly painful to read in this regard; this
particular episode has been criticized for this reason by other reviewers. This volume reveals a Sedaris who has grown
meaner and who has sharpened his edges with age. Thus the ensuing contrast of stories like “A
Guy Walks into a Bar Car”, when he describes with a certain tender air the
events that led him to first give Hugh a call, is all the more glaring. Clearly, if you get on his bad side, you’re
likely to stay that way, and to be railed against on the page—and even those he
loves are not entirely safe.
Sedaris,
curiously enough, devotes a chapter that seemingly obliquely addressed the
criticism he has faced over the embellishment of his essays, and their
challenged statuses as works of nonfiction. His humorous essays, it seems, are too good to be true. In a piece titled “Day In, Day Out”, he chronicles his longstanding
habit of diary keeping and how his entries have changed over the years. Nowadays, he writes down small snippets of scenes he
observes, using them as fodder that he then expands into polished essays he can
hopefully read to live audiences, on the radio, or send to publications. In one particular example, he chronicles how
while he wrote down a particularly odd exchange between a woman and a young
girl, he regrets that he didn’t take more time to describe their clothing and
various other physical details. In this
way is Sedaris perhaps offering a mea culpa about his process, or is he
challenging the same critics who condemn his embellishments. If he can’t remember every detail of every
encounter he has or observes, he seems to argue, why not embellish, and make a better story?
Sedaris also pulls no punches when discussing his
long-suffering father, shedding more light in what seems to be a complex and at
times, frustrating and adversarial relationship. But with the light of his
heavy fictionalization in mind, do we really know Lou Sedaris at all via his
son’s writing through the years, or do we have only the most meager impressions
of him? Are we indeed learning more about Hugh’s
personality when, in an essay entitled "Rubbish", Hugh develops a nonsensical idea to reduce the litter that blights the roads of the couple's new home in the English countryside, or is it once again David's voice filtered through another
character in his life? In this regard,
the call for greater honesty, or at least, for a reduction of embellishment in
Sedaris’ essays has some definite weight.
Sedaris
is by now in his mid-fifties, yet, thankfully, his observations of the current
generation (of which I am a part) are warm and affectionate. He expressed gratitude towards his younger
fans on his last book tour, for example, by handing out condoms at book
readings. When he inevitably does mock youngsters,
he manages to be funny without being overly curmudgeonly.
Interspersed
throughout this book are short speeches the author wrote for students to use
during speech competitions, which are an interesting throwback to the short-form
fiction of Barrel Fever, his first
book. Unfortunately, these stories tend
to follow the same sort of pattern and contain wildly exaggerated depictions of
vile, selfish people. First these
speeches, which are all written in the first person, slap the reader in the
face with an outsize, impossible to love persona, and then the speech gradually
unfolds and escalates to reveal the often-cruel punch line. These people are all classical Sedaris caricatures,
people so comically villainous that they only could be born from his mind,
based no doubt on some negative encounter. One particular speech, however, in which
Sedaris inhabits the mind of man who goes on a murder spree in response to the
New York legislature’s legalization of gay marriage, is rendered rather
poignant when we consider the vitriol Sedaris has likely faced during his life
due to his sexuality.
Let’s Explore Diabetes
with Owls
(which explores owls but not diabetes), should not be missed by a true fan of
Sedaris’ work, but I would not recommend it to a reader new to the author. I will continue to point those readers
towards Me Talk Pretty One Day or Dress Your Family in Corduroy and Denim,
another higher-quality, more consistent effort.
Yes, yes, yes! I read this last month and felt the same sense of discomfort, especially with the anecdotes about Chinese cuisine.
ReplyDeleteHmm, that's a bummer. Maybe I'll skip this one. Could it be he's out of ideas?
ReplyDeleteI read the first essay and thought it was interesting. I will continue to read although with a different expectation after reading your review. I will say however, that perhaps his perspective on life is changing as he ages? Well written review...and it had to be tough to be critical because you are such a fan!
ReplyDelete